Man shall not live by bread alone…

Originally posted on September 14, 2013

The LORD your God led you all the way these forty years in the wilderness to humble you and test you, to know what was in your heart, whether you would keep His commandments or not. So He humbled you, allowed you to hunger, and fed you with manna which you did not know nor did your fathers know, that He might make you know that man shall not live by bread alone; but man lives by every word that proceeds from the mouth of the LORD…Therefore you shall keep the commandments of the LORD your God, to walk in His ways and to fear Him.” ~Deuteronomy 8:2-3,6

 

For the LORD your God is bringing you into a good land, a land of brooks of water, of fountains and springs, that flow out of valleys and hills…a land in which you will eat bread without scarcity, in which you will lack nothing….~Deuteronomy 8:7,9

Hierarchy of Holiness

Originally posted on September 11, 2013

God

Messiah

Prophet

Apostle or Missionary

Priest

Good Man

Man

Messiah~A messiah is a saviour or liberator of a group of people, typically a high priest anointed by God.

Prophet~An individual who is claimed to have been contacted by the supernatural or the divine, and to speak for them, serving as an intermediary with humanity, delivering this newfound knowledge from the supernatural entity to other people.  The message that the prophet conveys is called a prophecy.

st-john-the-baptist-jen-norton

Apostle or Missionary~’One who is sent away’-A messenger or ambassador.

02MotherTeresa-1940-superJumbo

Priest~A person whose purpose is to always serve God, and is authorized to perform the sacred rituals of a religion, especially as a mediatory agent, and to be a bridge between man and God.

Good Man~A Christian who does God’s will, and who lives coram Deo.

FILE PHOTO: Evangelist Graham, preaches the Gospel to thousands of believers during the meeting at Bercy's Stadium in Paris as part of a worldwide crusade
Evangelist Billy Graham, preaches the Gospel to thousands of believers during the meeting at Bercy’s Stadium in Paris as part of a worldwide crusade, September 20, 1986.

Man~Everyone else.  And the Übermensch. 🙂

ubermensch02

The Veil, Mended

Originally posted on September 11, 2013

Recently, a very astute and learned fellow and I discussed the bible, and I mentioned that I felt confession to a priest was one thing I think the Catholic church got right (along with some sacraments and rituals), but he countered with the popular protestant belief that when Christ died the veil was torn, making priests no longer a necessary bridge between God and man.  That simply having the concept of Jesus in one’s heart and mind was enough to make one holy in God’s eyes.  Current Christians, protestants and Catholics alike, have adopted the notion that there are two tiers:  God and man.  Priests have been relegated to ceremonial status, or are respected as teachers; but are not really considered to be any more holy than any other man.

However, there is a hierarchy of holiness, if you will, that does exist.  As one transcends the ladder unto Heaven where God resides, he becomes more holy.  As he becomes more holy, he obtains more Godliness.  The highest man can go would be to be like Jesus, which is the goal of all good Christians.  As one obtains more Godliness he also obtains more power, by the grace of God, in the forms of omnipotence, omniscience, and omnibenevolence.  The primary purpose of a priest’s life is to serve the LORD.  But priests also have the ability to minister to man on God’s behalf.  Jesus gave priests the power in God’s name to go forth and forgive sins, exemplified at the last supper, especially in John 20:21-23:

So Jesus said to them again, “Peace to you! As the Father has sent Me, I also send you.”And when He had said this, He breathed on them, and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit.  If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.”

So for man to think that it is enough to think he is sorry for a sin, or to feel sorry for a sin, and that Jesus’ perfect death erases any need for a priest, is not scriptural and is not serving him fully; he is not going to reap the reward that true repentance and confession and forgiveness from a priest would allow.

I found a Catholic commentary on this subject and wanted to share it as it describes the benefits of confessing to a priest:

“The Advantages [of Confessing to a Priest]~

Is the Catholic who confesses his sins to a priest any better off than the non-Catholic who confesses directly to God? Yes.

First, he seeks forgiveness the way Christ intended.

Second, by confessing to a priest, the Catholic learns a lesson in humility, which is avoided when one confesses only through private prayer.

Third, the Catholic receives sacramental graces the non-Catholic doesn’t get; through the sacrament of penance, sins are forgiven and graces are obtained.

Fourth, the Catholic is assured that his sins are forgiven; he does not have to rely on a subjective “feeling.”

Lastly, the Catholic can also obtain sound advice on avoiding sin in the future.

During his lifetime Christ sent out his followers to do his work. Just before he left this world, he gave the apostles special authority [The last supper washing of feet of the apostles and eating of the body and blood of Christ illustrates the ceremony of the consecration of priests in the Old Testament Torah] commissioning them to make God’s forgiveness present to all people, and the whole Christian world accepted this, until just a few centuries ago. If there is an “invention” here, it is not the sacrament of penance, but the notion that the sacramental forgiveness of sins is not to be found in the Bible or in early Christian history.”  ~Taken from http://www.catholic.com/tracts/the-forgiveness-of-sins

I’d like to add that Jesus himself stated he did not come to abolish the law, but to fulfill it.  He made a new covenant, yes, but he replaced the need for daily animal sacrifice, and instead of priests taking on the people’s iniquity, he took it on himself.  The sacraments set forth by Moses were not abrogated by these things.

~Mary

Legalism versus Conceptualism

Originally posted on September 1, 2013

The way we believe as Christians currently is very conceptualistic, especially compared to the legalism of orthodox Judaism, as manifested in Jesus’ day, and before.  The Old Testament Torah is rife with hundreds upon hundreds of commandments, statutes, ordinances, and judgments that the children of Israel had to follow according to Moses, and those who put the oral tradition to paper, beginning in King David’s time.

Every day, Priests of the house of Aaron, of the house of Levi, had to offer, morning and evening, a fresh, clean, animal for sacrifice to atone for the people’s sins.  Not only could the common folk not come before the LORD, they could not even come near the tabernacle of meeting except to make their sin and peace offerings and tithes to the Priests and the Priests helpers.  And even Aaron and his sons and descendants could only go behind the veil to minister before the mercy seat–the actual presence of God–once per year, on the Day of Atonement.

It was necessary for the Messiah to come and to deliver man out of that impossible state.  Not only was it a blood bath daily, but the judgments handed out, even by Moses, were cruel, reminiscent of Hammurabi’s “eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth” law, carved into a code for the masses hundreds of years before.

So when Jesus came, and was accepted (eventually) as the perfect propitiation for our sins, and the sins of the whole world forever, what a relief it must have been!!  As the perfect Lamb of God, it became no longer necessary to sacrifice innocent animals daily to make man worthy.  Man was still unworthy, but Jesus made man new if man would only accept that Jesus was taking the place of the sacrificial beasts, and taking sin upon himself by dying willingly.

Jesus also preached a fresh message about God’s Love.  God in the OT was harsh and a discerning taskmaster more than he was a loving forgiver.  Oh, yes, he forgave the Hebrews much grumblings and times when they fell away from Him in the Wilderness, but God was definitely a harsh Elohim who could and would punish those for even questioning His rule; and He did it time and time again, as illustrated in the Old Testament.

It wasn’t that God became loving after Jesus, it is that when man first came to be monotheistic, it was in an atmosphere of polytheism where kings had godly attributes and could strike anyone down for anything; it was a harsh environment in which man lived.  So, the early tradition of the patriarchs saw God as the the One True God and divine, but in a way that replaced the all powerful impulsive pagan gods, but still held the basic aire of awesomeness and fearfulness that man had regarding his god; a primitive superstition that it is hard for us to understand across the deserts of time.  They were truly God-fearing.

Not many today would say they were God-fearing.  We have watered God down so that He is not so miraculous and wonderful as he was in the ancient times of our religion.  Men attributed almost everything to God’s signs and wonders in the early days of our faith, which is evident in the mythical stories of the Bible.  But now we place God somewhere in the middle of that great continuum and give him attribution and glory when WE feel it’s due; He doesn’t smite people anymore, He doesn’t have the ability (according to many) to heal miraculously anymore, He just sort-of hangs out loving us and watching us go about our way, without intervening in too fearful or too wonderful a way.

What happened to evoke this change in our outlook about God?  The are many reasons, but for now I want to focus on this part of it:  I think it was in large part due to our taking God out of our daily reality and putting him out of graspable bounds, into an abstract world we rarely have to contemplate.  The Hebrews had their tabernacle set in the midst of them.  Their whole world revolved around worshiping God daily through the Priests, making offerings of restitution and peace to the Priests, confessing to the Priests, and asking the Priests for atonement with God and judgments for conflicts in daily life.  Via blood sacrifice of animals and laws they could not overlook, like never eating blood, because the blood of an animal was too sacred for man to eat; and never eating fat because the fat was a sweet offering for the LORD; and laws like these, it was hard for man to escape his responsibility to God, and his role as congregant.

When Jesus came on the scene, he unbloodied the atonement ritual, which needed to happen.  Blood sacrifice smacked of pagan roots, though it was a necessary bridge for man being humbled before the LORD because the life is in the blood.  Ancient man revered this right of ceremony, and needed that to make atonement for their souls.  But Jesus did not erase all the Law, as much as he refined it.

Later, men came to start regarding Jesus as God, and this was a cemented decree at the Council of Nicaea in AD 325.  If Jesus replaces God, then it follows that everything Jesus said could replace everything in the Old Testament.  There is no surprise then that Christians rely too heavily on the New Testament, leaving the wisdom of the Old Testament to the dust of the ages.  Many Christians today cite the Two Great Commandments as the only ones needing to be followed.  They ignore the hundreds of other laws in the OT that God said, “This will be a statute for future generations, forever”!, and they allow any common folk to come directly before the LORD, no matter what sins they may have committed or whether they have sought proper restitution and forgiveness with a holy Priest.  Unless they are Catholic, they don’t even confess their sins anymore, and it’s doubtful most Catholics even still do attend confession.

They took liberties with Christ’s mission, and made Christ a thought and an action in place of God, whereby all that is required now in the eyes of most Christian doctrine is that one believes in Christ as Messiah and falsely, Christ as God, and all will be well with that person spiritually.  That one simply understands the concept of Christ for their life, and it will all be made right.

For nearly two millenium we have had man believing in the One True God.  Man was God-fearing and God, through Moses, made a lot of laws (some not from Moses) to keep man obedient.  Now for nearly two millenium we have man believing that the One True God is divided into three pieces and that just understanding that concept is enough to be obedient, that God is Loving.

The fact is that there is One True God.  He is to be feared and to be as friend.  He has laid out many laws for us to follow in every realm of our lives–spiritual, personal, familial, relational, financial, and societal, which can keep us obedient and successful.  We need those laws to be tangible and in our daily lives just as we need to understand they are sometimes intangible.  Jesus is not the answer.  God is the answer!  Jesus is a new bridge to God.  We cannot replace God with Jesus.  We cannot replace Priests with people.  We cannot replace daily worship to God merely with mindfulness of Jesus.

It takes love for God, faith (holding fast to Him at all times), and obedience (to walk in His ways), to come into the realm of God.  That is the holy trinity.

Love,

~Mary

I feel like…

Originally posted on August 31, 2013

Nothing has the ability to truly affect me anymore. Like I feel things, and my body, heart, and mind move to react as usual, but then it’s circumvented or short-circuited and all I feel is white buffer. Like I am in a white climate-controlled room, and I am resting on the comfortable floor. Is this peace? My body recoils somewhat because it isn’t used to true peace. It’s used to responding to the world’s demands.

The world doesn’t own me anymore. God does. Thank You, LORD.

Phoenix

Originally posted on August 31, 2013

Dry and established

On rocky cliff adorned by flowers

Springs forth fount of life

Whose essence is pure and clean.

But they seize it for their own

Are cunning and burgeon with evil;

Steal and enslave

Into headwaters of satan.

The Problem of the 300 Levites

Originally posted on August 26, 2013

It’s funny how once you see it, it seems obvious, but before you see it, it isn’t.

That is the case with the 300 missing Levites.  Oh, yes, the Priestly Writer strikes again.  I’m having so much fun with him!  *squeals gleefully*   He gives me many good riddles to solve.  This one has me stumped however.  Now that I know his-’eh hum’-number, I can usually crack his codes quite quickly.  But the Case of the Missing Numbers in Numbers has me masticating.

Shall we begin?  This will be quite a whirlwind~

It starts at the beginning of the Book of Numbers with the census.  The numbers are important to me inasmuch as the Priestly Circle has hidden a code in them.  Other scholars have proven that the large swaths of people (hundreds of thousands) could not really have occurred during this time in the Wilderness, and have made legitimate arguments for that.  Since I know the Priestly Writer used numerology to make the numbers add up to a hidden cohesive code, I do not bother with trying to support or refute the likelihood of the actual numbers given in the Bible, but prefer to deduce the symbolic meaning they represent.

In the Wilderness, the tribes moved around the desert in a formation of a cross (E/S/W/N), in three tiers basically, with the precious Ark of the Covenant nestled in the very middle of them.  As this process is explained, it becomes clear, if one plots it, that the Priestly Circle attributes the most important people (for his purposes) to the East.  Then the South.  Then the West,  Then the North.  This makes a clockwise motion.  It’s not that the East is always the most important in the Bible.  Indeed the Ark of the Covenant within the Holiest of Holies is situated in a westerly direction.  But East has always been prized by ancient, pagan cultures, probably because the sun rises in the east.

Anyway, for brevity I will omit the actual families’ names here, but the book explains how the twelve tribes of Jacob are divided up into bands of three with the Levites in the middle, guarding the ark.  That equals 13, yes.  But remember that the tribe of Joseph was divided into two bands.  [the stage of this division is set up all the way back in Genesis in the poem, “Jacob’s Last Words to His Sons”, and is iterated more clearly in Numbers 1:32-35.  This makes me think the Priestly Writer’s influence was cast all the way back into Genesis].  If we crunch the numbers, we see that we come up with 10/10/10/7.  If we multiply these out we get 7,000.

Then the band of Levites is counted and their number given is 22,000 [Numbers 3:39].  However, if you add up the numbers given in “Census of the Levites Commanded”, one gets 22,300.  Did the Priestly Writer do this on purpose?  I’ve never noticed a ‘mistake’ in his numbers thus far.  It has been proposed that the numbers given for the family of Kohath (the most important family) of 8,600 has been mistransliterated from 8,300.  But if that is the case, then the larger band of Dan, et al., who serves the northern flank would also have been mistransliterated because their number given is 157,600.  I understand mistransliterations do happen as in the Red Sea really being the ‘Reed’ Sea, but when it comes to the Priestly Writer one just never knows!

So, that is the problem of the 300.  Let’s forge on.

The inner band of Levites is actually divided into two bands, their families from one month old and up; and those who service the articles of the tabernacle who are 30 to 50 years of age, make up the innermost circle, and even camp as a legion close to the articles.  When we apply numerology to the family band, we get the number 7.  When we apply it to the very inner priestly circle (!) we get 3.

The same clockwise rotation applies for the two circles of Levites as applied to the outer circle.  So, in effect, we get this:

  • outer circle:     1/7,000
  • middle circle:  7/22,000
  • inner circle:     12/3

Again, 22/7 represents a pi of 3.  But instead of a circle this time, we have three circles twirling together, as in a vortex.  1 and 7 and 12 represent 1 God, 7th degree of holiness, represented by 12 units within a circle (like a clock is divided into 12 hours).

So perhaps the Priestly Writer gave us an extra 300 because he wanted it to come out with 7 in the middle circle, and/or perhaps he wanted to repeat the theme of pi in a three-dimensional plane.  I doubt it was a mistransliteration…

Exciting times ahead, because as I was studying my spiritual journal I stumbed across a writing in Job and guess what a quick and simple addition revealed??  You got it: 22/7/3 again.  Scholars do not know who wrote Job, but I have a feeling I do.  And now you do as well.  🙂

This has rocked my world a bit, this numerology discovery.  At first I literally thought it was God speaking to me from His Word.  While I still think there was that aspect for sure, because I otherwise would never have seen it, A theory is working itself out in my head that in the era just before Christ came on the scene, there was so much debauchery and corruption within the Israelite ruling class, with firstborn sons having priestly privileges, and oftentimes abusing those privileges, not to mention bad rulers; that I think there existed an underground circle of priests who, throughout all these hard times of unGodly leadership and exile, tried to lace God’s true Word with a hidden meaning in order to identify it and keep it pure, for those deemed worthy.

I studied somewhat about the rulers in the first and second centuries B.C., and I see no evidence of these Priestly Circle numbers in their realm, though they did use numbers like 8 or 800, which was likely borrowed from a more eastern influence.  This sort-of thing can tell us, in light of the Priestly Writer’s hidden number code, that they probably were not deemed worthy nor were they truly holy high priests, even if they called themselves such.

In essence, the Priestly Writer might have manipulated the numbers and circumstances of the Old Testament to fit an agenda of who the Priestly Circle deemed worthy or important, versus it being the literal word of God, but that doesn’t mean that the primary import or meaning behind it is not Godly.  It does become obvious, however, that following certain, or ALL, of the recorded statutes word for word, is no different than following man-made law word for word.  As Jesus came to represent so well, God’s Word and Will stands deeper and is more unconditional than what men have had the ability to influence in the pages of time.

Update: Then I just ran across this link: https://www.thetorah.com/article/recounting-the-census-a-military-force-of-5500

Love,

~Mary

Submission and Strength

Originally posted on August 25, 2013

It occurred to me just now that men and women have a different struggle when it comes to opening up to God and living in His Divine Will.

Men struggle with the submission aspect.  Of submitting to the LORD.  Men are made to be strong and to protect and control things, but this can also be their weakness when coming before the LORD.  Because pride MUST be laid down so that the door to God can be fully opened.  This tends to be difficult for men to do.

Women, on the other hand, usually don’t have as much of a problem with submission.  It is in our nature, for the most part.  We can submit to the LORD just as we understand we need to submit to our partner.

Women’s weakness is, however, having strength.  Having strength to withstand dry periods of not.  Not having emotional support, not having reciprocity, not having the love or relationships we desire, or the life we want.  Women tend to cave in before God’s will can be done, which makes us more prone to staying in captivity, or seeking out things hastily that are not right for us.

Men, however, have strength to withstand much drought.  It makes sense that dominance and strength go together, and submission and weakness go together.  Perhaps that is one of the many reasons man and woman fit well together.

OF COURSE>  Sometimes you get it reversed:  The men are submissive and the women are strong, but I’m speaking in general!

~m

My Official Declaration of Love for my LORD [made on this day, the day of my final consecration to be a Priest]

Originally posted on August 25, 2013

Dear God,

You have been calling me to You all my life.

You made me for You.

You made me with special abilities to ‘see above’.

But it is only now, at 44, that I have the

maturity to stand against the world so

that I might stand with You.

In my younger days, I might have questioned

my commitment to You,

or faltered in my faith to You, perhaps at times

when the world seemed promising or vibrant in some way I missed.

But I have lived enough to know that no matter

how enticing the world can appear, or how

tempting it might be to my personal dezires,

it cannot deliver me unto true happiness;

it cannot deliver me unto true peace.

I know peace comes through obedience to You.

I know joy is the elixir that bubbles forth from

that fermentation.  I know that peace of mind

is obtained only through faith in You and Your Word,

even though You can and will be my most intangible and elusive lover.

I know that seeking out and going

after Your One Perfect Truth for me

is the only contentedness I need to feel on this earth.

Your Love is enough for me, my LORD, God Almighty.

It is my desire, it is my strength,

it is my holy refuge.

The world will never suffice.

Your forever faithful love and servant,

~Mary

I Yearn for Bondage to God

Originally posted on August 24, 2013

Dear LORD,

I am Your slave and you are my Master.

I feel You becoming more than my Father, but my Lover and Giver of Everything.

You are my soul mate.

I want to do anything for You, to serve You, and to please You.

And to be Your voice to guide Your children back to You~

Love Forever,

~Mary